Is being gay genetic or environment
Interested in diving deeper into the earth of LGBTQ+ comprehension and inclusivity? Our comprehensive LGBT Development in the Workplace is designed to empower individuals with the knowledge and empathy to produce more inclusive environments. Whether you’re an ally, a member of the group, or simply curious, this training is a valuable resource for all.
This articles aims to provide you with factual information to facilitate you form your own opinion.
FAQs
What affects someone’s sexual orientation?
Medical experts believe that sexual orientation is a mix of psychological, environmental, and biological factors. Many others believe that someone’s genes and hormones play a major role too. Many medical professionals believe that sexual orientation isn’t something that a person chooses, instead, it is a spontaneous part of who someone is.
What is sexual orientation?
Sexual orientation refers to who someone is attracted to and/or wants to own relationships with. Some common sexual orientations include: straight, homosexual, lesbian, bisexual, or asexual, to entitle a few. Sexual orientation is alternative than gender and gender identity as the latter refers to who someone is (male, fe
Biology alone doesn’t result in homosexuality, suggests unused epigenetic research
By Peter Tatchell
The latest ‘gay gene’ study gives no comfort to homophobes
Daily Telegraph – London, UK – 9 October 2015
READ & COMMENT: http://bit.ly/1OqUW2P
This is an extended version of Peter Tatchell’s Daily Telegraph article:
Vladimir Putin, Robert Mugabe, Pope Francis and other anti-gay earth leaders may adequately rejoice at recent scientific research that points to homosexuality as being significantly influenced by pre- and post-birth environmental factors. They’ll no doubt see it as refuting claims that people are born gay and that same-sex attraction is immutable. They may be tempted to conclude that if homosexuality is not fully biologically determined, this analyze can be exploited to eradicate it.
But they’d be improper . The degree and nature of these environmental influences is, as yet, unknown. They are likely to be multiple and complex. So any bid to abuse the modern research and manipulate the environment to eliminate same-sex need is unlikely to work.
The study by Dr Tuck C. Ngun and his team at the University of California found that an algorithm using epig
Nature vs. Nurture: The Biology of Sexuality
MED prof speaks tonight on whether sexual orientation has genetic basis
Homosexuality was considered a mental illness when Richard Pillard was in medical college. It was the 1950s and the School of Medicine professor of psychiatry was at the University of Rochester. At the time, the American Psychological Association still listed homosexuality as a disorder and psychologists and psychiatrists were trained on ways to treat it.
The first psychological test undertaken to resolve whether there was a biological explanation for homosexuality was in 1957. With a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health, Karen Hooker studied the relationship between homosexuality and psychological development and illness. Hooker studied both homosexuals and heterosexuals—matched for age, intelligence, and knowledge level. The subjects were then given three psychological tests: the Rorschach, the Thematic Apperception Test (TAT), and the Make-a-Picture-Story Evaluate (MAPS). Hooker found no major differences in the answers given by the two groups. Because of the similar scores, she concluded that sexuality is not based on environmental factors.
In
Massive Study Finds No Free Genetic Cause of Lgbtq+ Sexual Behavior
Few aspects of human biology are as complex—or politically fraught—as sexual orientation. A clear genetic link would suggest that gay people are “born this way,” as opposed to having made a lifestyle choice. Yet some fear that such a finding could be misused to “cure” homosexuality, and most research teams hold shied away from tackling the topic.
Now a modern study claims to dispel the notion that a single gene or handful of genes make a person prone to lgbtq+ behavior. The analysis, which examined the genomes of nearly half a million men and women, create that although genetics are certainly involved in who people choose to hold sex with, there are no specific genetic predictors. Yet some researchers scrutinize whether the analysis, which looked at genes related with sexual activity rather than attraction, can sketch any real conclusions about sexual orientation.
“The message should remain the same that this is a complex behavior that genetics definitely plays a part in,” said study co-author Fah Sathirapongsasuti, a computational biologist at genetic testin
Not long ago, I had a conversation with a Methodist minister who was lamenting the recent schism in the once “United" Methodist Church. He explained that this split had come about over a disagreement about whether to accept LGBTQ persons into their congregations.
“So, is there really a gay gene?” he asked.
“Well, yes, sort of,” I replied. “But it’s complicated.”
As University of Toronto (Canada) psychologist Doug VanderLaan and his colleagues explain in an article they recently published in the journal Archives of Sexual Behavior, science now clearly shows that people are born with their sexual orientation. Many people assume that if a trait is something we're “born with,” it must be genetic—but in proof, it’s not that simple.
On the one hand, traits can be determined by multiple genes, such that a single trait may have any number of genetic causes. On the other hand, the way we come out of the womb is determined as much by conditions inside the womb as they are by our genes. That is, the presence of particular hormones during prenatal development, as well as the reactions of our mother’s immune system, can have a big influence in shaping who we are.